Prediction of Tom Nijssen vs John Ross Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Nijssen vs J. Ross

Tom Nijssen

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'8" (173 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

John Ross

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'8" (173 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Nijssen 1 - 0 Ross

They have played 2 sets in total, with Tom Nijssen winning 2 and John Ross winning 0. The last match between Tom Nijssen and John Ross was at the Bergen CH, 24-10-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Tom Nijssen getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nijssen	1
Ross	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Bergen CH(10-24-88)

Stats

Tom Nijssen

John Ross

T. Nijssen vs J. Ross H2H Profile

T. Nijssen	Stats	J. Ross
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
38.82% (66-104)	Career Total W/L	32.47% (25-52)
1	Indoor	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Nijssen vs J. Ross Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tom Nijssen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while John Ross has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tom Nijssen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while John Ross has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tom Nijssen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas John Ross has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tom Nijssen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with John Ross winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tom Nijssen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 20/27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/7). John Ross has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 18/31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 6/15).
Player level: In the last year, Tom Nijssen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as John Ross has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tom Nijssen winning 1 times and John Ross being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tom Nijssen winning 2 and John Ross winning 0.
The last match between Tom Nijssen and John Ross was at the Bergen CH, 24-10-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Tom Nijssen getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tom Nijssen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while John Ross has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tom Nijssen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while John Ross has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tom Nijssen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and John Ross has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tom Nijssen vs John Ross Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Nijssen vs J. Ross H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Nijssen	Stats	J. Ross
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Nijssen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ostrava - 09-10-1995
R1 Patrick RafterP. Rafter	L	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3)	Stats
Hilversum - 25-07-1994
R1 Karel NovacekK. Novacek	L	3-6 7-6(2) 6-2	Stats
Stuttgart - 18-07-1994
R1 Marc-Kevin GoellnerM. Goellner	L	4-6 7-5 6-3	Stats
Barcelona - 04-04-1994
R1 Nicklas UtgrenN. Utgren	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Key Biscayne - 07-03-1994
R1 Bryan SheltonB. Shelton	L	6-3 6-7(5) 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Ross Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Washington - 15-07-1991
R1 Chuck AdamsC. Adams	L	5-7 6-3 7-6(2)	Stats
Cincinnati - 06-08-1990
R1 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Washington - 16-07-1990
R1 Nicolas PereiraN. Pereira	L	7-6 6-2	Stats
Kiawah Island - 07-05-1990
R1 Joey RiveJ. Rive	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Orlando - 02-04-1990
R1 Jimmy AriasJ. Arias	W	7-6 1-6 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Nijssen vs J. Ross Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Nijssen	Stats	J. Ross
38.82% (66/104)	YTD Win/Loss	32.47% (25/52)
41.49% (178/251)	Sets Win/Loss	36.41% (71/124)
47.51% (1950/2154)	Games Win/Loss	45.57% (889/1062)
42.55% (20/27)	Hard Win/Loss	36.73% (18/31)
31.48% (17/37)	Clay Win/Loss	28.57% (6/15)
45.90% (28/33)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/4)
12.50% (1/7)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (1/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
212.91	Average Opponent Rank	233.7
23.08% (3/10)	Slam W/L	28.57% (2/5)
43.75% (7/9)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/5)
41.67% (5/7)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
33.72% (29/57)	Main Tour W/L	37.10% (23/39)
51.16% (22/21)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/3)
39% (56/143)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (23/68)
36% (9/25)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	22% (2/9)
40% (8/20)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
41% (22/54)	Deciding Set Win %	41% (11/27)
70% (71/50)	1st Set Won, Won Match	70% (27/19)
30% (71/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	30% (27/8)
16% (99/16)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (50/6)